Archive for January, 2009

Zen and the Art of Buying a Motorcycle

Friday, January 30th, 2009

I am an occasional user of Facebook. I first got an account just to keep an eye on my kids. Over time, however, I “ran into” a lot of old friends and it was great making connections with them. Although I probably look at my page every day or so, I rarely post anything new to it. I’m annoyed by people who constantly twitter whatever they’re doing at the time, no matter how uninteresting it may be to others. Too often, their twitters are simple subtle (or not so subtle) crowing.

I don’t think I was guilty of this myself, but, perhaps so, when I set my status a couple of weeks to indicate that “Manny is looking for the ideal motorcycle.” For sure, it indicates that I can economically and psychologically afford spending money on a dangerous toy. Someday, I’ll write a post summarizing the idea of “biological handicaps and mating rituals”. The idea (not mine) is that the same way that some animals have ridiculous physical handicaps (e.g. peacock plumes), humans exhibit “handicaps” (long fingernails, expensive cars, anorexic bodies) that similarly say, “you should have sex with me because I’m so cool that I can handle the burden of this stupidity.”

What surprised me about the post was the number of responses that I got from my friends. No, not a single woman offered to have sex with me (not even my wife who is very hesistant to support or discourage my plan in any way). Rather, a bunch of guys all chimed in with advice about what motorcycle to buy.

What a great conversation opener! Several people whom I didn’t know rode motorcyles, gave me valuable insights and offered up pictures of their own bikes. I got so much traffic, I had to “clear” my Facebook status.

In addition to talking to friends, I’ve also been visiting a lot of motorcycle dealerships. There’s actually not that many of them in the Seattle area. I think our weather has a lot to do with this (riding is mostly a summer event around here), but the economy is playing a role, too. A Honda dealership in Seattle closed down recently.

Each dealer, of course, tries to steer you to whatever they think they can sell you. If you go in asking for a sport bike, they’ll tell you that a 100hp+ bike with a ton of torque is just fine for beginners. Ditto if you ask for a 250cc off-roader or a 2000cc touring bike.

My favorite approach, however, was the one taken by the BMW dealer. He asked, “what is your fantasy?”. He clearly understood that, when people are buying motorcycles, they’re buying more than transportation. True, people who buy Porsche’s or Prius’ are driven by fantasies, too, but those who buy Toyota Camrys are just looking at getting from point A to point B.

My motorcycle fantasy involves several things:

  • A bike that’s comfortable to ride (not easy being 6′6″)
  • One that will be easy to handle (I am a newbie rider)
  • A bike that’s underpowered enough to keep me out of trouble (while I learn) but powerful enough to take me on short (<500 mile) tours without rattling my bones too much
  • A bike that fits my personality

The first 3 points are mostly one’s of geometry and engineering. The last point, however, is much more difficult to quantify. Certain bikes are associated with certain personalities. Here are some personal observations/stereotypes:

  • Harley Davidson – someone who buys an HD would probably buy a Hummer. 20 years ago, an HD rider would work as a bouncer at a dive bar. Today, an HD rider is probably upper-middle class, 50 years old, and rides less than 1000 miles a year.
  • Ducati – this person would probably buy a Land Rover or Jaguar in spite of their terrible quality records. Probably a 40-year old, overpaid, middle-manager or lawyer.
  • BMW – drives a Lexus LS460 sedan and buys $100 Bordeaux’s. A 40-year old successful executive.
  • Anything Japanese – a baby boomer who’s never bought an American car. Shops at Whole Foods.
  • Triumph/Indian/Beull/Moto Guzzi – anyone who doesn’t fit into the above categories

Personally, I love the looks of the retro bikes (Triumph, Indian), do not fit on a Ducati, and can’t quite bring myself to pay BMW prices. Ultimately, I’ll want a touring bike (maybe HD, maybe not), but will probably start out Japanese (Suzuki V-Strom 650).

In spite of the grueling personal self-examination that’s involved, I’m having fun looking at motorcycles. I take my safety class at the end of February and hope to be on the road by mid-March!

Always Be What You Is

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

Today’s number: 17.3 stone

When I was a kid, I used to watch a lot of cartoons. They were great back then. Superheroes. Herculoids. Foghorn Leghorn. Tom and Jerry seriously murdering each other. The later Saturday fare (Archies, Smurfs, The Banana Splits, et. al.) always seemed to feature insipid characters trying to indoctrinate the viewer to be Good Citizens. I’ll take mindless violence anyday.

To this day, for reasons that are unclear, I remember a particular cartoon from the 60’s: “Tooter Turtle”. It was definitely in the Indoctrination category than in the Fostering Future Felons genre, but it made an impression on me, perhaps through sheer repetition. In each episode, Tooter Turtle (a stupid turtle) would insist that his friend, Mr. Wizard (a lizard), would turn him into something else. Tooter would ask to be a knight or a hunter or a sky diver and Mr. Wizard would oblige. Tooter would then experience an episode (possibly hallucinogenic) where he would see what it was like to be this alternate identity, would get into trouble and would end up with the same moan: “Help me, Mr. Wizard!”. The wizard would hear him, incite his magic incantation (or, perhaps, inject the turtle with Thorazine) and Tooter would return to reality. Mr. Wizard would then repeat his oft-repeated mantra, “Be just vhat you is, not vhat you is not. Folks vhat do zis are ze happiest lot.” You could tell the Wizard was wise due to his German accent.

“Always be what you is” (attributed to “Dennis Ross” but clearly ripped off from Tooter Turtle) is a good motto to live by. To me, it’s a corollary of “don’t regret your mistakes” and “never look back.” Let me explain.

We are the total sum of every decision we’ve ever made and every random happenstance that has affected us. Just as the flap of a butterfly’s wing could have caused hurricane Katrina, so might have any change in our past decisions and circumstances caused us to become different people.

If I’d not sold Microsoft stock to build a house in 1993, I might have an extra $5M in my bank account. If I’d not eaten all those cookies, I might weigh 30 pounds less. If I’d taken my father to the doctor more often, perhaps he’d be alive today. Perhaps, but then, again, I wouldn’t be me. Oh, I’d have the same DNA and many other recognizable characteristics but the things that define who I am, at this moment, would be different.

Perhaps, I’d be in a different job. Perhaps I would have left Microsoft early and started a company and made a killing in the dot com days. Perhaps I would have started petz.com and lost it all. Perhaps, being 30 pounds lighter, I’d assume myself to be healthier, would have never exercised and would have died from a heart attack 5 years ago. Perhaps, I’d be agonizing over putting my father in a nursing home.

Unless you are truly despondent and have absolutely nothing in your current life that you would keep (in which case, you need more than a change in mottos), you should accept the wisdom and folly of everything you’ve ever done. You are the sum of every decision you’ve and every random happenstance in your past. There is no more point in regretting your mistakes than in wishing you were someone else. Always be what you is.

Turning 50

Friday, January 16th, 2009

This post is a bit premature as I’ve still got a year to go or so (Jan 17, 2010). Nevertheless, given the significance of the semi-centennial, I am starting my party planning early.

It is my sentiment that celebrating the big “L” (as Julius Caesar referred to it) should be a significant event. What I’ve done is to ask a set of friends to celebrate it with me (most of them are L-ish, too) by proposing some adventure. As long as they’re willing to do it with me and the adventure entails an equal challenge for both of us, I’m game. I’ve suggested that the adventure involve a certain degree of discomfort if not danger. Not “work as an Arabic translator in Mosul”-type danger but perhaps “jump out of an airplane”- or “take a long sail”- type danger. After all, what better way to feel alive than to face death (if only at a hundred paces)?

So far my friends have responded with a language immersion trip (Chinese), a motorcycle trip and golf in far-flung places. I’m still hoping for a long hike, sail or kayak trip, too, maybe a safari. For sure, this will justify buying the Canon 5D Mark II.

Admittedly, these are indulgences. I figure a budget of $50k (naturally) will probably cover all the activities. Although this is a lot of money, it’s cheaper than buying a Porsche 911. Yes, the money would be better spent donating it to UNICEF. I prefer to view this as my own personal economic stimulus package.

When I do embark on these, I’ll try to post here as I experience each adventure. First stop: motorcycle lessons in February.

Living, Aging and Dying

Monday, January 12th, 2009

Today’s number: 17.9 stone

First, my apologies, in advance, for bumming you out. Although not my express intention, today’s topic is hardly uplifting.

That said, let me start out with a poem, one I recently forwarded to a friend turning 50:

On Himself
by Robert Herrick
 
A wearied pilgrim I have wander’d here,
Twice five-and-twenty, bate me but one year;
Long I have lasted in this world; ’tis true
But yet those years that I have lived, but few.
Who by his gray hairs doth his lustres tell,
Lives not those years, but he that lives them well:
One man has reach’d his sixty years, but he
Of all those three-score has not lived half three:
He lives who lives to virtue; men who cast
Their ends for pleasure, do not live, but last.

The abridged version of this is: “there’s a difference between living and lasting; it’s only living if you live a good life.” I’ll forego any definition of “living a good life”. To some this might mean “being good” (”virtue”). To others, this might mean contributing something to the community. To others yet, this might simply mean not stealing their neighbors’ newspapers too often.

By any metric, my mother, has lived a good long life. She turns 88 this year and is, as many say of their own mothers, “a saint.” She is the paradigm of kindness, generosity and selflessness. Alas, even though my mother’s faculties are mostly in tact, her body is another story. She suffers from osteoarthritis and a seriously impaired sense of balance. Two things result: considerable pain and occasional falls (leading to more pain). She has very little strength left in her hands and she has a minimally usable right shoulder (dislocated during a fall and never mentioned to anyone).
 
She has lost several family members (a sister, a brother, several friends) and, frankly, seems to be looking forward to her own death. She jokes about how little time she has with us and about how it doesn’t make sense for her to think beyond the short term. I can tell this is not just “gallows humor” and mental preparation for the inevitable. I think she’s simply getting to the point where her pain and her limitations seem to offset the joy of living.
 
3000 miles away lies another story. A good high school friend of mine has cancer. After chemotherapy and apparent remission a few months ago, he’s taken a bad turn. He spent a couple of weeks in the hospital with shingles then MRSA. After recovering from these, it turns out that his cancer is back in several organs. He needs to go through more chemo, but has been readmitted to the hospital with respiratory problems.
 
As with my mother, this friend, too, is a saint. Of our entire high school gang he’s always been the nicest, kindest and gentlest of us. Mind you, we’re now a pretty grizzly bunch of lawyers, executives and bureaucrats but, nevertheless, chance could not have been more cruel in choosing whom to screwe.
 
There’s no point in agonizing over the injustice of biology. One lives longer than she wants; the other is stricken in his prime. As the old saying goes, “Life’s a bitch and then you die.” So, as Herrick says, focus on maximizing your living. Enjoy your family. Pay attention to your friends. Be kind to the dog.

Dieting

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

Today’s number: 18.1 stone

I swear that I am not writing this post because I’ve just made a New Year’s Resolution regarding weight loss and fitness. I made the resolution last November in no way associated with the new year.

Regardless, here’s the situation: after living the “good life” in Spain for a couple of years, I returned to the States in 2002 and went on my first Atkins binge. I lost a lot of weight, getting myself down to a svelte 210 pounds. Before you scoff, keep in mind that I’m 6′6″ tall (shoeless) and weighed 225 in high school. In addition to the Atkins, I was playing golf 2-3 times a week meaning that I was walking 12-18 miles while carrying a heavy bag (12 if I was playing well and 18 if not!). I was also doing Yoga which, for some reason, turns out to be a good weight loss practice.

Fast forward 7 years or so and I’m back to 254 pounds. Obviously, it’s all Atkins’s fault (dead or not).

What happened? The most significant thing is that I started “working again” in 2004. From 2002-4 I’d been doing occasional consulting but never going into an office for more than a day a week. When I started Centeris (my software company; now “Likewise”) that changed drastically. Not only was I going to an office 5+ days a week, while there, I was sitting on my ass half a day then having a restaurant lunch before coming back and sitting down some more. If I wasn’t in the office, I was probably traveling, eating in restaurants and drinking too much. It took me 9-12 months to return to my pre-Atkins weight.

What now? For one, I’m running again. I started running about 15 months ago then got injured and stopped. Now, I’m healthy again and can run 3 miles at least two or three times a week. In addition to running, I’m working with, yes, a “personal trainer” at the Bellevue Pro Sports Club.

If you’re a current or former Microsofty (as I am), you know what I’m talking about. You pay $50-$70/hour to someone in order that they can shame you into working out. It works, too. My trainer calls it “accountability”. If you’re on the hook for a good bit of coin, you’re going to make it to your appointment.

Here’s something else that I’ve discovered: if your trainer is a woman (or better yet a “girl”), it works even better. And, although it has something to do with sex, it has nothing to do with Sex. The reason why it works is that, when a woman asks you to do something (e.g. a bunch of crunches), you’re gonna do it. You can’t say “no, I’m too tired” or “I’m just too weak!”. You’re going to buck up and do whatever she asks you. The smaller and younger the trainer is, the better success of this phenomenon.

I’ve had, 4-5 sessions now and I’ve got a long way to go, but I’m feeling good. I’m particularly working on strengthening up my knees to avoid further running injuries. Although it’s early, I think it’s effective; I’ve been able to run without any knee or hip or shin pain.

To further exploit the “accountability” factor, I’m going to emulate Bridget Jones here and start posting my weight on a periodic basis. Don’t forget that 1 stone = 14 pounds.